Guest Engagement Opportunity Report
Prepared for John Dishinger, SVP Strategic Relationships and Growth · July 2026 · Confidential
This report is grounded in publicly available signals about Lifestyle Holidays Vacation Club: its property portfolio, digital presence, member engagement model, and technology partnerships. It maps those signals to the engagement and data opportunities most likely to compound in value at LHVC's scale. Benchmarks reference luxury vacation club and all-inclusive resort industry data.
At a Glance
members across properties in the Dominican Republic, Mexico, and beyond. Member data may be spread across multiple PMS environments and a third-party loyalty platform.
separate member-facing platforms a guest may navigate in one stay: main site, lhvcresorts.com, INTrave'L portal, lifestyleexcursions.com, and the Ying Yang Spa app. Each may hold its own data.
members across a multi-destination portfolio. At this membership scale, even a modest improvement in retention through behavioral data compounds significantly across the base annually.
countries where LHVC is present - one membership brand across a multi-destination portfolio. The member expects a seamless experience across all of them. The data architecture may not yet support that expectation.
Opportunity Indicators
Industry benchmarks and estimated gaps based on LHVC's scale and signals. Actuals will differ; these frame the conversation.
Revenue Gap Framing
Directional
based on member scale
Reconnecting outsourced loyalty data and unifying member profiles across LHVC's multi-property footprint creates a revenue opportunity that compounds with membership scale
Member Lifetime Value Uplift
Measurable
▲ with connected member data
Resort and vacation club groups that unify member data across all properties consistently report LTV improvement; the gap is widest when loyalty data is outsourced
Loyalty Data Under LHVC Control
Partial
▼ outsourced to Arrivia since 2011
Travel redemption data for 80,000 members lives in Arrivia's platform. Member behavioral signals may not be flowing back into LHVC's own systems
Member-Facing Platforms
5+
▼ fragmented member journey
Each platform a member touches in one stay may hold separate data, creating blind spots in the member relationship and no single source of truth
Renewal Rate Uplift (Behavioral)
Significant
▲ vs. calendar-based outreach
Vacation clubs using engagement-triggered renewal campaigns consistently outperform those using fixed calendar-based outreach on renewal conversion
AI Readiness Posture
Blocked
▼ Data prerequisite not yet in place
AI personalization, churn prediction, and renewal scoring all require a unified member record as their input. With 5+ siloed platforms and loyalty data outsourced to Arrivia, that prerequisite is not yet visible from public signals.
Where the Opportunity Sits
Each signal maps to a specific gap and a concrete capability LHVC could activate.
Channel Engagement Snapshot
How LHVC's current visible channels compare to best-practice benchmarks for luxury vacation clubs of similar scale.
What We're Seeing in the Market
Comparable luxury vacation clubs and what's driving their results.
What's Working
Clubs that unified their loyalty data saw renewal rates climb within two seasons
Multi-property vacation clubs with member redemption and travel data sitting in a third-party platform, similar to LHVC's Arrivia arrangement, consistently find that their sales team is making renewal decisions without access to a significant portion of the member's behavioral history. Clubs that built a unified data layer above the third-party platform, pulling behavioral signals back into their own CRM, found that their renewal teams could identify at-risk members before the conversation, not after. The key was not replacing the partner, but owning the data that flowed through it.
What's Working
Cross-property guest profiles are becoming a competitive differentiator for multi-destination clubs
Vacation clubs operating across multiple countries are finding that a member who has stayed at three properties in different destinations is one of the most valuable retention and upsell targets they have. But only if the cross-property history is visible. Clubs that have built unified profiles across destinations consistently outperform those with siloed property data on upsell conversion, because the offer is anchored in what the member has actually done, not what the segment model predicts.
Watch This
Outsourced loyalty platforms can become a data blind spot as clubs scale
The arrangement LHVC has with Arrivia may have been the right call at the time it was set up. But as the club has grown to 80,000 members across a multi-destination portfolio, the question worth asking is how much of the member relationship LHVC can see versus how much lives in a system it doesn't control. Clubs that have let this arrangement run unchanged are often finding that their renewal and retention decisions are being made without access to a significant portion of the member's behavioral history.
Watch This
Platform fragmentation may be visible to members before it's visible to leadership
When a member has to navigate 5 separate platforms to plan, book, and enjoy one stay, the friction compounds quietly. It may not show up in a single KPI. It shows up as a slightly higher drop-off rate on the booking flow, a slightly lower excursion attachment rate, a slightly slower response to renewal outreach. Each one is explainable in isolation. Taken together, they often point to the same root cause: the member experience is only as connected as the systems behind it.
Watch This
AI tools for vacation clubs are ready, but the data foundation has to come first
AI-powered renewal scoring, churn prediction, and personalized outreach are available to vacation clubs right now, and the vendors are actively selling them. The clubs buying them without a unified member data layer are finding that the tools underperform, because the models have no reliable behavioral signal to work from. The prerequisite is not a technology purchase. It is a data architecture decision: one member record, across every platform, owned by the club. LHVC's combination of 5+ member platforms and outsourced loyalty data means that prerequisite may not be in place yet. The data foundation built now determines what AI can do in the seasons ahead.
Opportunity Scorecard
LHVC's estimated maturity across six dimensions that drive member revenue and retention. Based on public signals only.
Maturity ratings are estimates based on public signals only. A 30-minute conversation with John's team would sharpen every dimension significantly.
Three Things Worth Doing Now
Sequenced for impact given where LHVC is in its growth.
Build a unified member data layer above the existing platform stack
LHVC does not need to replace Arrivia or any of its five member-facing platforms to get a unified view of the member. What it needs is a data architecture layer that sits above all of them and pulls behavioral signals into one record, regardless of where they originate. A member's spa booking, excursion purchase, room preference, and loyalty redemption should all be visible in one place. WillDom has built exactly this kind of integration layer for multiple systems and can scope what it looks like for LHVC in one session.
Bring loyalty data visibility back under LHVC's control
The Arrivia partnership may be working well operationally. The question worth asking is whether the behavioral signals it generates are flowing back into LHVC's own CRM and renewal systems. If 80,000 members' travel redemption and engagement behavior is only visible inside Arrivia's platform, then LHVC's renewal and retention decisions are being made without a significant portion of the member picture. This is not about ending the partnership. It is about ensuring LHVC owns the data that flows through it. John's background in RCI loyalty programs makes this distinction very familiar.
Score the 80,000-member base for renewal risk before the next renewal cycle
With 80,000 members across a multi-destination portfolio, a meaningful number are likely at varying stages of engagement risk right now, without anyone flagging them. A member health scoring model using booking frequency, platform activity, excursion engagement, and redemption behavior could identify at-risk members 90 or more days before renewal and trigger the right outreach at the right time. This may be achievable with data LHVC already holds across its existing platforms, with no new data collection required.
Worth connecting?
John, you spent years at RCI working directly with vacation clubs on exchange partnerships and member growth, including LHVC itself. You know what a well-functioning member data infrastructure looks like from the outside. The gap between that and what's possible with LHVC's current platform stack is exactly what might be worth looking at. Happy to find 30 minutes if it's worth a conversation.
Book 30 Minutes →